Re: green bubble syndrome

Jolly Roger <jollyroger@pobox.com> wrote:

On 2024-10-14, Chris <ithinkiam@gmail.com> wrote:

Jolly Roger <jollyroger@pobox.com> wrote:

On 2024-10-13, Alan Browne <bitbucket@blackhole.com> wrote:

On 2024-10-12 18:24, Chris wrote:
 

For someone wishing to end the discussion you've gone quite into
some depth to try and find flaws. Of which, most are open to
interpretation and none are unique to this org.
 
Why so desperate to find flaws when wanting to end the discussion?
Simply not responding would be easier.

 
Can't argue with you on that, other than the "depth" of my flaw
search.
 
This whole subject was patently flawed from its troll induced
beginning, however.

 
And as usual, it's the people scrutinizing

 
There's been no scrutiny. It's all been knee-jerk reactions from an
entrenched position.

 
That's a lie. Expecting to know more about the poll than the pollsters
divulged isn't a knee-jerk reaction,

It is when you're only interested because you don't like the result.

nor is learning and disseminating
that the pollsters actually pay participants,

Not unusual.

nor is pointing out that
the sample may not be applicable to the entire population.

All samples "may not be applicable", that's inherent in statistical
sampling. What additional information can you add beyond that?

the troll who are being disparaged. It's like clockwork. The bullied
get punished for standing up to the bullies. 🤣

 
Playing the victim is a new low for you...

 
Projection.

Denial.