Sujet : Re: "Performance king"
De : thomas.e.elam (at) *nospam* gmail.com (Tom Elam)
Groupes : comp.sys.mac.advocacy misc.phone.mobile.iphoneDate : 04. Nov 2024, 19:24:05
Autres entêtes
Organisation : A noiseless patient Spider
Message-ID : <vgb3g3$10e0f$3@dont-email.me>
References : 1
User-Agent : Mozilla Thunderbird
On 11/4/2024 12:33 PM, Alan wrote:
'Apple's M4 Max is the single-core performance king in Geekbench 6 — M4 Max beats the Core Ultra 9 285K and Ryzen 9 9950X
All that power is in a small package.'
<https://www.tomshardware.com/pc-components/cpus/apples-m4-max-is-the-single-core-performance-king-in-geekbench-6-m4-max-beats-the-core-ultra-9-285k-and-ryzen-9-9950x>
'On the x86 end, AMD and Intel pale in contrast. The M4 Max handily keeps up even in multi-core at a fraction of the power—beating Intel's Core Ultra 9 285K by around 19% in the single-core category and 16% in the multi-core category. Compared to the Ryzen 9 9950X, the M4 Max showed 18% higher single-core performance and 25% higher multi-core performance.'
But there are those who believe that Apple is terrible at chip design.
:-)
Could Apple be a reason Nvidia CPU tech may kill off Intel's laptop CICS CPU line.
"Performance king"
Re: "Performance king"