Re: Racist Apple is targeting blacks only and abusing white women to do it.

On 2024-12-11 17:39, Joel wrote:

Alan <nuh-uh@nope.com> wrote:
 

the overall experience[, of an OS, makes it best].  Linux easily passes the bar.

>
Another non-answer...

>
Play an MP3 on Audacious and it's just as good as Winamp.  Write a
letter with LibreOffice, although admittedly it's just as great on
Winblows too.  You give up nothing of real value by using Linux.

>
And how are those comparisons with macOS; the subject under discussion?

  Why would I pay Apple for something I can get from Linux?

That isn't the subject under discussion.

 

[Forte Agent for Windows is] the most comprehensive GUI interface I've seen for Usenet.

>
And you can't run it on Linux...

>
You can, with Wine.

>
Then you're admitting that Linux needs the help of Windows software to
be "superior".

>
Not very much of it.

>
Still, it's an admission that Linux can't cut it without Windows.
>
What else do you run under WiNE?

  EncSpot.  I have mIRC installed, but am not using it anymore.

So you need Windows applications because Linux is inadequate for your needs.
Got it.

 

[Microsoft Windows] File Explorer has features embedded in right-clicks.

So does the [Apple Mac] Finder.

>
"The" Finder.  You talk about it like it's not just some second-rate
crapp by Apple.  Really hilarious.

>
That's just how it has always been referred to.

>
Yeah, they tricked you into mimicking the phrasing.

>
Who cares?

  Who cares if you're a sucker?  I guess you don't.

That does a NAME have to do with it?
I'm an atheist but I still say "God dammit" or things like it.
It's just a name.

 

I had the MacBook in 2010.  It was an experiment.  I ended up not
liking macOS.

Nevertheless, you pontificate 14 years later as if you know all about
how macOS works today.

  How much has really changed?

Lots.
But that is an admission that you should shut the hell up about what macOS can and cannot do.