Sujet : I think it's funny how desperate Apple is on its crappy overall iPhone battery life
De : marion (at) *nospam* facts.com (Marion)
Groupes : misc.phone.mobile.iphoneDate : 09. Mar 2025, 07:22:01
Autres entêtes
Organisation : BWH Usenet Archive (https://usenet.blueworldhosting.com)
Message-ID : <vqjc28$2oap$1@nnrp.usenet.blueworldhosting.com>
User-Agent : tin/1.6.2-20030910 ("Pabbay") (UNIX) (CYGWIN_NT-10.0-WOW/2.8.0(0.309/5/3) (i686)) Hamster/2.0.2.2
I think it's funny how desperate Apple is on its crappy overall iPhone
battery life given the single most effective way to increase overall
battery life (i.e., number of charge/discharge cycles before dropping below
80%) is, OMG... what shocking science this is... a BIGGER battery.
Since Apple always puts garbage batteries in iPhones, that "bigger" battery
translates to a "normal-sized" modern battery (which no iPhone ever had).
It's no wonder the EU won't allow Apple to sell the iPhone 14 & older in
the EU this summer - because Apple can't certify the battery will last.
Now comes Apple's sheer desperation as outlined in this recent article:
*Apple might have a way to boost battery life in the iPhone 17 Air*
<
https://www.digitaltrends.com/mobile/iphone-air-high-density-battery/>
"If correct, the iPhone 17 Air would be the first Apple iPhone
to make use of high-density battery cells, which can pack more
energy into a small package."
Only Apple marketing can make the outlandish propaganda claim that a 1%
efficiency can beat a 100% deficiency in battery capacity, when it comes to
cycles before it drops below 80%.
The real question is who is *that* stupid to believe Apple's propaganda?