Liste des Groupes | Revenir à mpm iphone |
On 2024-03-25 02:45, Anonymous wrote:According to the law, that doesn't matter as far as conspiracy is concerned.Tyrone wrote:Apple has plenty of competition.You keep saying that, but it makes no sense. And AGAIN, what laws is Apple not>
abiding? Because YOU don't like Apple does not mean they are breaking any
laws.
>
Apple is a consumer products company. They are selling directly to consumers.
How do you sell consumer products to consumers (who line up to buy your
products, BTW) AND be "anti-consumer" at the same time?
>
If Apple truly WAS "anti-consumer", then NO ONE WOULD BUY THE PRODUCTS. Do you
understand simple logic?
>
This DOJ case is all based on competitors whining that it is too difficult for
them to make money selling software/whatever to Apple's customers. Well boo
hoo. Apple is like 25% of the global market for phones and PCs. Try selling
your stuff to the 75% of the market.
>
Or feel free to create your own phones/tablets/desktops/ecosystem and make
your money from your own products. Not just leeching from other company's
products.
>
U.S. anti-trust laws exist to protect consumers. Not competitors.
I'm not a lawyer, but the government can claim that Apple is engaging
in conspiracy to restrain trade and commerce, which is broadly illegal
15 U.S. Code § 1:and does not require Apple to actually be a monopoly. And forget suing;ROFL. At least you got the "I'm not a lawyer" part right.
Tim Cook himself can be arrested and tried criminally for this if the
government ever decided to actually enforce the law.
Les messages affichés proviennent d'usenet.