Re: Apple inflated the cost of its products through anticompetitive conduct

On 2024-03-29 09:21, Larry Wolff wrote:

On 3/29/2024 1:29 AM, Your Name wrote:
 

The Verge says the DOJ's case is that the American consumer is paying more
for the iPhone than they should be paying. And they get less functionality
on the iPhone than they get on Android phones.

>
If that was true, then Samsung and many other higher-end phone makers
should be in court as well since they charge about the same price for
their phones as Apple does.

 It's a good thing you're not one of Apple's high-priced lawyers given
you're not even aware that Samsung sells a range of phones, from dirt cheap
to very expensive, as do almost all Android phone makers on the market.

What does a Samsung phone that matches the specs of an Apple iPhone cost, doofus?

 

Yes, you can but a cheaper Android smartphones from various makers, but
they are lower-end models that use older / slower CPUs and GPUs, lower
quality components, less RAM, etc. to achieve that lower price ... you
get what you pay for.

 Again, it's good you're not an Apple lawyer as the quality of most Android
components far exceeds that of Apple's (such as integrated 5G modems).

LOL!
They literally use the SAME modems "Larry".

 Not only do most Android phones have better hardware that doesn't even
exist in the iPhones (such as sd card slots) but many Android phones have
screens that are built by Samsung who makes a lot of the iPhone screens.

So then, not better screens and I'll bet only 3 people in 100 use the SD card slot in their phone.

 And all Android phones can run software that can't be run on an iPhone,

And vice versa.

so you need to do some research before you'll pass the Apple versus Android
exam, as you don't know the first thing about how the platforms differ.