Sujet : Re: Ultra Wide Band?
De : cameo (at) *nospam* unreal.invalid (Cameo)
Groupes : misc.phone.mobile.iphoneDate : 27. Apr 2024, 18:01:22
Autres entêtes
Organisation : A noiseless patient Spider
Message-ID : <v0jb0u$fjd0$1@dont-email.me>
References : 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8
User-Agent : Mozilla Thunderbird
On 4/24/2024 11:17 PM, Alan Browne wrote:
On 2024-04-24 07:43, Cameo wrote:
On 4/23/2024 7:06 PM, Alan Browne wrote:
On 2024-04-23 12:52, Cameo wrote:
Then it’s on … Provided that the network provider has a near antenna to
broadcast UWB. We need to see some indication of that so we can see the
difference in data speed when it exists and when it does not.
>
Do we?
>
I do. Because inquiring minds want to know.
Conditions:
some network provider with broadcast UWB - which is not even a "thing" as far as I can tell.
some indication that it's "doing something".
some comparative of data speed (you mean rate, but let's not quibble*) from some non existent state v. a state that is not known to exist.
"Inquiring minds want to know" is the motto of the National Enquirer.
Hmm - not the best reference...
But it doesn't make itt less true.
Ultra Wide Band?
Re: Ultra Wide Band?