Re: google antitrust trial

On Mon, 06 May 2024 07:32:56 +1000, Alan <nuh-uh@nope.com> wrote:

On 2024-05-05 13:17, Rod Speed wrote:

On Mon, 06 May 2024 04:58:53 +1000, Alan <nuh-uh@nope.com> wrote:
>

On 2024-05-05 11:41, Rod Speed wrote:

On Mon, 06 May 2024 04:07:23 +1000, Alan <nuh-uh@nope.com> wrote:
>

On 2024-05-05 10:56, Rod Speed wrote:

On Mon, 06 May 2024 02:42:56 +1000, Alan <nuh-uh@nope.com> wrote:
>

On 2024-05-04 23:58, Rod Speed wrote:

On Sun, 05 May 2024 15:26:57 +1000, Alan <nuh-uh@nope.com> wrote:
>

On 2024-05-04 22:08, Rod Speed wrote:

On Sun, 05 May 2024 13:17:23 +1000, Alan <nuh-uh@nope.com>  wrote:
>

On 2024-05-04 19:10, Andrew wrote:

Hank Rogers wrote on Sat, 4 May 2024 16:32:03 -0500 :
>

Surely the same people here who were defending Apple’s  business model will
come to Google’s defense now too…
>

>
Google will get off with a slap on the wrist. Maybe they'll  later buy apple
and increase their presence.
>
The two cults will merge their churches.

 Both Google and Apple stretch the laws, which is why both  lose so many
lawsuits; but what's different is nobody defends Google to  the death.

>

Apple hasn't lost any lawsuits.

 Yes it has, most obviously with intellectual
property lawsuits and tax lawsuits.

>
Cite one.

 https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Litigation_involving_Apple_Inc.

>
'Wikipedia does not have an article with this exact name.'

 <https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Litigation_involving_Apple_Inc.>

>
You might want to look at how many suits that article shows Apple  lost...

 Nope, that's what I was saying all along,

>

Read it again.

 No need.

>
So you think.
>

Pity about
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Apple_Inc._v._Samsung_Electronics_Co.
and yes you need to manually add the . in the browser box again

>
Pity about you not understanding what the issue is...

You never could  bullshit your way out of a wet paper bag, liar.