Sujet : Re: Apple publicly apologizes for celebrating its destruction of the human experience
De : danmin (at) *nospam* danminart-dot-com.no-spam.invalid (Danart)
Groupes : misc.phone.mobile.iphoneDate : 20. May 2024, 06:26:07
Autres entêtes
Message-ID : <l_ednT2jIPJyQ9f7nZ2dnZfqnPgAAAAA@giganews.com>
References : 1
User-Agent : newsSync 665652948
> Larry Wolff wrote:
> Apple apologizes for its iPad Pro ad
>
https://www.cnn.com/2024/05/09/tech/apple-apologizes-for-ipad-pro-ad/index.html > The ad celebrated Apple's destruction of human creativity and art.
>
> Apple apologizes for iPad ad
>
https://www.washingtonpost.com/technology/2024/05/09/apple-ipad-ad-apology/ > Apple apologized for destroying beloved physical tools used by
artists.
>
>
https://variety.com/2024/digital/news/apple-ipad-pro-ad-criticism-hugh-grant-1235996294/ > Apple has been interpreted as a visual depiction of Apple's
> devastation of cultural industries, where Apple is celebrating
> the destruction of the human experience.
>
>
https://adage.com/article/digital-marketing-ad-tech-news/apple-apologizes-ipad-pro-crushed-ad-it-missed-mark/2559321 > Because Apple celebrated a grim representation of technology
crushing the
> history of human creativity, the tech giant no longer plans to run
the
> commercial on TV.
>
>
https://www.techradar.com/tablets/ipad/apple-scraps-ipad-pro-crushed-ad-and-issues-rare-apology-and-it-was-the-right-thing-to-do > On Thursday, Apple's VP of Marketing Communications Tor Myhren told
Ad Age
> it would not air the ad on TV (it's still at this writing on
YouTube),
>
>
https://mashable.com/article/crush-ipad-commercial > Companies don't have to pretend they respect their customers; they
just
> have to get them to part with their money.
Lets all just
agree on one thing. Apple devices are literally the same as Tampons
and Maxipads.
Speaking of which has the "ipad Max" been released yet?
I heard about the ones that could take "heavy loads",
prevents leakage, and deodorizes itself, when inside "the
pocket"?
This is a response to the post seen at:
http://www.jlaforums.com/viewtopic.php?p=665086575#665086575