Sujet : Re: It's a myth that cellphone use caused the accident rate to rise in the USA
De : andrew (at) *nospam* spam.net (Andrew)
Groupes : misc.phone.mobile.iphone comp.mobile.android ca.drivingDate : 30. May 2024, 06:14:10
Autres entêtes
Organisation : BWH Usenet Archive (https://usenet.blueworldhosting.com)
Message-ID : <v391v2$2g70$1@nnrp.usenet.blueworldhosting.com>
References : 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12
User-Agent : PiaoHong.Usenet.Client.Free:1.65
Newyana2 wrote on Wed, 29 May 2024 22:39:54 -0400 :
Your time may be better spent buying a machinegun and opposing
abortion. No one debates the issues anymore.
Without taking sides on the issue... I will note the inconsistencies...
What's interesting is in the United States, the party platforms are not
self consistent on the taking of a life (whether almost born or later).
Democrat platform (paraphrased)...
a. It's fine to kill an unborn child with an abortion
b. It's not fine to kill a living person with a gun
Republican platform (paraphrased)...
a. It's not fine to kill an unborn child with an abortion
b. It's fine to kill a living person with a gun
Obviously those are paraphrased, but the point I'm making is neither
platform is self consistent, as a consistent platform might be instead...
A. It's not fine to kill an unborn child with an abortion
B. It's not fine to kill a living person with a gun
Or...
B. It's fine to kill a living person with a gun
A. It's fine to kill an unborn child with an abortion
The inconsistencies show, at least to me, they don't even believe in their
own words because if they cared about life, their platform would be
consistent.
It's not.