Re: Apple accused of underreporting suspected CSAM on its platforms

On 2024-07-24 11:08, Andrew wrote:

Chris wrote on Wed, 24 Jul 2024 17:23:22 -0000 (UTC) :
 

Chris. Please put your well-educated adult hat on when you read this.
Warning: There is math involved in sensibly logical thought processes.

>
You present no maths. Just baseless supposition.

 Chris,
When you earned that PhD, did you never take any logic classes?
 Reporting images isn't the end goal.
The end goal is convictions.
 Everyone knows that.
 The fact the stories don't report the only metric that matters is a very
clear indication the CSAM process is a complete sham. It's pure bullshit.
 

1. There is NOTHING in the news articles about conviction rates.
2. Let's say that another way: The articles are complete bullshit!
>
The articles are yellow journalism clickbait, Chris.
>
Without specifying conviction rates, the number of reported images is
completely meaningless, Chris.
>
In fact, it could be Apple's conviction rate is far greater than that oF
Google & Facebook for all we know, Chris.
>
Since the conviction rate isn't stated, I will assume it is zero.
Think about that.

>
You're only making that assumption because it suits your preference and
bias.

 The only metric that matters is the conviction rate.
Not the number of images reported.
 Did you ever take logic in college, Chris?

The only metric that matters with battery capacity in smartphones is run time.
Did you never take logic in college, Arlen?