On 23/07/2024 19:49 Jolly Roger wrote:
> On 2024-07-23, badgolferman wrote:
>> Jolly Roger wrote:
>>>On 2024-07-23, badgolferman wrote:
>>>> Jolly Roger wrote:
>>>>> On 2024-07-23, badgolferman
>>>>>wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Apple declined to comment on the NSPCC's accusation, instead
>>>>>> pointing The Guardian to a statement it made when it shelved the
>>>>>> CSAM scanning plan. Apple said it opted for a different strategy
>>>>>> that “prioritizes the security and privacy of [its] users.” The
>>>>>> company told Wired in August 2022 that "children can be protected
>>>>>> without companies combing through personal data."
>>>>>
>>>>> This is one reason many people choose Apple over alternatives.
>>>>
>>>> iPhone. The preferred mobile device of child molestors.
>>>>
>>>> This could be a new marketing ploy someday!
>>>
>>> Privacy for everyone is important.
>>
>> Sorry, I can't agree with that. Some people give up their right to
>> privacy when they harm others or society. The laws are there for
>> everyone, not just those who choose to follow them.
>
> Your problem is you want to invade everyone's privacy regardless of
> whether they are hurting anyone. That's the only way CSAM scanning can
> work, and why Apple wisely withdrew their proposal even though it worked
> harder to preserve privacy than any other solution.
>
You're wrong. Apple doesn't give a rat's ass about anyone's privacy. They do, however,
care about their profits and when people start threatening to leave their platform if this
client-scanning scheme goes through, they start to listen.
