Sujet : Re: Apple accused of underreporting suspected CSAM on its platforms
De : jollyroger (at) *nospam* pobox.com (Jolly Roger)
Groupes : misc.phone.mobile.iphoneDate : 25. Jul 2024, 20:22:24
Autres entêtes
Organisation : People for the Ethical Treatment of Pirates
Message-ID : <lgfmvgFee44U1@mid.individual.net>
References : 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14
User-Agent : slrn/1.0.3 (Darwin)
On 2024-07-25, Chris <
ithinkiam@gmail.com> wrote:
Andrew <andrew@spam.net> wrote:
Jolly Roger wrote on 24 Jul 2024 21:33:12 GMT :
It's probably zero given it's the most important metric.
It's not zero. Not even close.
You're simply guessing. I'm using logic. They're different logical
algorithms.
>
Nope. You're guessing just as much as JR.
>
The facts - and we know you like them, but never look for them - are
that there are many convictions on a depressingly regular basis. Just
look at the press releases from the DoJ Project Safe Childhood:
https://www.justice.gov/psc/press-room
My statements aren't guesses. There have been plenty of convictions.
Unfortunately, there have also been privacy violations of innocent
people. And that's my primary concern when it comes to CSAM scanning.
-- E-mail sent to this address may be devoured by my ravenous SPAM filter.I often ignore posts from Google. Use a real news client instead.JR