Re: Apple accused of underreporting suspected CSAM on its platforms

Jolly Roger wrote on 25 Jul 2024 15:41:59 GMT :
>

Nothing you can say will change the fact that a greater-than-zero number
of people have been convicted from CSAM scanning - just like nothing you
can say will convince me that CSAM scanning can be done without
violating the privacy of innocent people. Things like this should not
happen:

>
I'm not disagreeing with you, Jolly Roger.
The CSAM scanning is a violating of privacy.
>
The question isn't that it's a violation of privacy.
The question is whether it's worth that violation of privacy.