Re: Apple accused of underreporting suspected CSAM on its platforms

On 2024-07-25, Andrew <andrew@spam.net> wrote:

Jolly Roger wrote on 25 Jul 2024 19:22:24 GMT :
>

You're simply guessing. I'm using logic.  They're different logical
algorithms.

>
Nope. You're guessing just as much as JR.
>
The facts - and we know you like them, but never look for them - are
that there are many convictions on a depressingly regular basis.
Just look at the press releases from the DoJ Project Safe Childhood:
https://www.justice.gov/psc/press-room

 
My statements aren't guesses. There have been plenty of convictions.
 
Unfortunately, there have also been privacy violations of innocent
people. And that's my primary concern when it comes to CSAM scanning.

>
The cite Chris listed said NOTHING whatsoever about the conviction
rate.

It certainly shows the conviction rate is higher than your claimed
"absolute zero". So it seems it was you who lied first. I realize you
want us to ignore this, but your focus on who lied demands we recognize
it.

--
E-mail sent to this address may be devoured by my ravenous SPAM filter.
I often ignore posts from Google. Use a real news client instead.

JR