Re: Apple accused of underreporting suspected CSAM on its platforms

Jolly Roger wrote on 25 Jul 2024 21:12:36 GMT :

The cite Chris listed said NOTHING whatsoever about the conviction
rate.

 
It certainly shows the conviction rate is higher than your claimed
"absolute zero". So it seems it was you who lied first. I realize you
want us to ignore this, but your focus on who lied demands we recognize
it.

Oh Jeez. This is exactly how I know you zealots lack a normal IQ.
Think about what was actually said and what you & Chris lied about.

Think about it. Please. Look at your own cites, Jolly Roger. L@@K!
That you both resort to lies means you lack the ability to reason.

You both fabricated imaginary convictions based on the CSAM imaging by
Facebook, Google, and Apple - and yet - your cites say nothing of the sort.

You lied.
You fabricated evidence that does not exist in your cite.

Why?

I don't know if your low IQ is the problem or if you are simply lying, JR.
Your cite says NOTHING about how the evidence was obtained.

Yet, you lied by fabricating that the cite says Apple, Google & Facebook
provided the evidence for which those convictions were obtained.

Do you think I'm stupid, Jolly Roger?
I see right through your lies and those of Chris.

The fact you resort to lies shows that you can't back up your point.

Show me evidence of the conviction rated for people who were reported to
authorities by Apple, Google and Facebook, Jolly Roger.

Just showing convictions is completely meaningless to this point.
The fact you can't comprehend that is an indication of low intelligence.

Stop fabricating evidence that doesn't exist in your cites please.