Liste des Groupes | Revenir à mpm iphone |
On 2024-07-24, Chris <ithinkiam@gmail.com> wrote:True. The balance of risk was proportionate, however. Much moreso than the current system.Andrew <andrew@spam.net> wrote:Actually, Apple could not guarantee that, and there was a non-zeroChris wrote on Wed, 24 Jul 2024 07:20:19 -0000 (UTC) :>
>The NSPCC should really be complaining at how ineffectual the tech>
companies are rather than complain at Apple for not sending millions
of photos to already overwhelmed authorities.
For all that is in the news stories, it could be ZERO convictions
resulted.
>
Think about that.
>
Is it worth everyone's loss of privacy for maybe zero gain in child
safety?
Apple's solution wouldn't have resulted in any additional loss of
privacy
chance that false positive matches would result in privacy violations.
plus it only affected customers of icloud. Don't like it? Don't useThat much is true. Only images uploaded to iCloud would have been
icloud. Simple.
examined by the algorithm.
Les messages affichés proviennent d'usenet.