Re: Apple accused of underreporting suspected CSAM on its platforms

On 2024-07-26, Andrew <andrew@spam.net> wrote:

Jolly Roger wrote on 25 Jul 2024 21:12:36 GMT :
>

The cite Chris listed said NOTHING whatsoever about the conviction
rate.

 
It certainly shows the conviction rate is higher than your claimed
"absolute zero". So it seems it was you who lied first. I realize you
want us to ignore this, but your focus on who lied demands we
recognize it.

>
zealots lack a normal IQ

Straight to the insults.

You both fabricated imaginary convictions

Actually, both Chris and I provided actual documentation of actual
convictions.

You lied.

No, you're projecting.

Just showing convictions is completely meaningless to this point.

No, it's entirely meaningful and disputes your bogus claim that there
have been "absolutely zero" convictions.

We're done here.

--
E-mail sent to this address may be devoured by my ravenous SPAM filter.
I often ignore posts from Google. Use a real news client instead.

JR