Sujet : Re: Apple accused of underreporting suspected CSAM on its platforms
De : andrew (at) *nospam* spam.net (Andrew)
Groupes : misc.phone.mobile.iphone alt.privacyDate : 27. Jul 2024, 19:38:40
Autres entêtes
Organisation : BWH Usenet Archive (https://usenet.blueworldhosting.com)
Message-ID : <v83erg$261m$1@nnrp.usenet.blueworldhosting.com>
References : 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19
User-Agent : NewsTap/5.5 (iPad)
Jolly Roger wrote on 26 Jul 2024 22:24:28 GMT :
Actually, both Chris and I provided actual documentation of actual
convictions.
Oh Jesus. Everyone, yes, even you zealots, knows there are convictions.
Nobody said otherwise.
It's no longer shocking that you just claimed every conviction was a result
of Apple/Google/Facebook CSAM scanning - when you have no idea if they are.
Both of you lack the IQ to fathom there is a huge difference.
It's like you try to prove all tickets are made by short cops when all you
list as your "proof" is a listing of all the tickets that were issued.
Do you not realize your cites only show convictions?
Not convictions explicitly due to Apple/Google/Facebook CSAM scanning?
And certainly not the conviction rate based on the number of CSAM reports?
Seriously.
You'd fail every college test in the world making such absurd claims.
Your total lack of logic is how I know, Jolly Roger, your IQ is very low.
I knew Alan Baker was that stupid - but I didn't know you & Chris were too.
All your strongly held beliefs are based on exactly zero facts, JR.