Sujet : Re: Apple accused of underreporting suspected CSAM on its platforms
De : andrew (at) *nospam* spam.net (Andrew)
Groupes : misc.phone.mobile.iphone alt.privacyDate : 27. Jul 2024, 19:58:37
Autres entêtes
Organisation : BWH Usenet Archive (https://usenet.blueworldhosting.com)
Message-ID : <v83g0s$qcf$1@nnrp.usenet.blueworldhosting.com>
References : 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13
User-Agent : NewsTap/5.5 (iPad)
Jolly Roger wrote on 26 Jul 2024 16:12:58 GMT :
But that is quite literally the only tool he has!
It really is. When his lies are laid bare and shown to be false, he
inevitably just doubles down and tells them over and over again. It's
extremely childish.
I find it rather interesting that the zealots claim an essentially 100%
conviction rate based on the Apple/Google/Facebook CSAM reports...
And yet...
Nobody here actually knows what the conviction rate is.
All we know for sure is that everyone is harmed.
But for all we know, the conviction rate is so low that nobody is saved.
None of you zealots ever took basic logic classes.
Note: The people who wrote the reports certainly know the conviction rate;
and the fact they left out that most important metric, implies it's dismal.