Sujet : Re: Apple accused of underreporting suspected CSAM on its platforms
De : andrew (at) *nospam* spam.net (Andrew)
Groupes : misc.phone.mobile.iphone alt.privacyDate : 27. Jul 2024, 20:02:58
Autres entêtes
Organisation : BWH Usenet Archive (https://usenet.blueworldhosting.com)
Message-ID : <v83g92$1l3v$1@nnrp.usenet.blueworldhosting.com>
References : 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16
User-Agent : NewsTap/5.5 (iPad)
Jolly Roger wrote on 26 Jul 2024 16:08:29 GMT :
Since you lack a normal IQ
Straight to the insults
Hi Jolly Roger,
To put it bluntly, every assessment that you make is based on your low IQ
not being able to discern between convictions and conviction rates due to
the reporting by Apple, Google & Facebook.
They're not the same thing.
That you can't discern the difference is because of your low IQ.
Don't blame me for that as it's not my fault you don't know math.
Suffice to say that, without the conviction rate, all we know is many
people are harmed and, for all we know, almost nobody is saved.
We can assume the people lambasting Apple are not stupid; they know what
the conviction rate is: the fact they left it out means it's likely dismal.