Sujet : Re: Apple accused of underreporting suspected CSAM on its platforms
De : jollyroger (at) *nospam* pobox.com (Jolly Roger)
Groupes : misc.phone.mobile.iphone alt.privacyDate : 28. Jul 2024, 03:36:58
Autres entêtes
Organisation : People for the Ethical Treatment of Pirates
Message-ID : <lglp69Fd7bmU1@mid.individual.net>
References : 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15
User-Agent : slrn/1.0.3 (Darwin)
On 2024-07-27, Arlen can't deal <
with@truth.com> wrote:
On 2024-07-27 11:58, Andrew wrote:
Jolly Roger wrote on 26 Jul 2024 16:12:58 GMT :
But that is quite literally the only tool he has!
>
It really is. When his lies are laid bare and shown to be false, he
inevitably just doubles down and tells them over and over again. It's
extremely childish.
I find it rather interesting that the zealots claim an essentially 100%
conviction rate based on the Apple/Google/Facebook CSAM reports...
>
Arlen...
>
...why must you lie?
>
Literally no one has made that claim.
He's so predictable and childish.
First he says there have been "absolutely zero" convictions as a result
of CSAM scanning.
Then he says there are "probably zero" convictions.
Now he fabricates others supposedly saying "essentially 100% conviction
rate" when literally nobody said
that.
-- E-mail sent to this address may be devoured by my ravenous SPAM filter.I often ignore posts from Google. Use a real news client instead.JR