Re: Apple accused of underreporting suspected CSAM on its platforms

On 2024-07-28, Andrew <andrew@spam.net> wrote:

Jolly Roger wrote on 28 Jul 2024 02:39:40 GMT :
>

You're the one who started out with "absolutely zero" convictions, you
complete asshole. Then you walked it back to "probably zero", and now
you are fabricating things nobody here has said - all while desperately
trying to move the goal post to conviction rates. And the fact that you
actually think you are fooling anyone here reflects more on your own IQ
than anyone else's. You're a pathetic weak-minded fool, little Arlen.
Take your childish insults and shove them where the sun don't shine.

>
For Christs' sake. It's no longer surprising you can't tell the difference
between the number of convictions versus the number from Apple's reporting.

You're trying to move the goal post. Here are your own words, little
Arlen:

On 2024-07-24, Andrew <andrew@spam.net> wrote:

>
Given, for all we know, absolutely zero pedophiles were caught and
convicted by the Meta & Google (and even Apple) system, the safety
gained is zero.

Choke on them.

That you can't tell the difference is how I know your IQ is below normal.

Juvenile insults are all you have, little Arlen.

--
E-mail sent to this address may be devoured by my ravenous SPAM filter.
I often ignore posts from Google. Use a real news client instead.

JR