Re: Apple accused of underreporting suspected CSAM on its platforms

On 2024-07-29 04:23, Andrew wrote:

Chris wrote on Mon, 29 Jul 2024 06:50:53 -0000 (UTC) :
 

You not comprehending the difference between zero percent of Apple reports
versus zero total convictions is how I know you zealots own subnormal IQs.

>
Not at all. My position hasn't changed. You, however, have had about three
different positions on this thread and keep getting confused which one
you're arguing for. lol.

 
Au contraire
 
Because I only think logically, my rather sensible position has never
changed, Chris, and the fact you "think" it has changed is simply that you
don't know the difference between the percentage of convictions based on
the number of reports, and the total number of convictions.
 
When you figure out that those two things are different, then (and only
then) will you realize I've maintained the same position throughout.
 
Specifically....
 
a. If the Apple reporting rate is low, and yet if their conviction
    rate is high (based on the number of reports), then they are NOT
    underreporting images.

>
Apple's reporting rate is ZERO, because they're not doing scanning of
images of any kind.