Sujet : Re: Too bad nospam can't see this: Apple adds call recording to iOS 18
De : nuh-uh (at) *nospam* nope.com (Alan)
Groupes : misc.phone.mobile.iphoneDate : 13. Aug 2024, 03:18:38
Autres entêtes
Organisation : A noiseless patient Spider
Message-ID : <v9efpu$3iasl$1@dont-email.me>
References : 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20
User-Agent : Mozilla Thunderbird
On 2024-08-12 19:06, badgolferman wrote:
Alan <nuh-uh@nope.com> wrote:
On 2024-08-12 12:53, badgolferman wrote:
Alan <nuh-uh@nope.com> wrote:
On 2024-08-12 10:22, badgolferman wrote:
Alan wrote:
>
On 2024-08-12 09:40, badgolferman wrote:
Alan wrote:
>
All you've discovered is that the metrics for declaring death are
wrong.
>
Death, by definition, is that state from which you cannot come
back.
>
This is no different than when doctors used to believe that no
heartbeat was definitive proof of death.
>
When did you become a doctor?
>
One doesn't have to be a doctor to realize that there is a difference
between how we DECIDE if someone is dead vs whether or not they are
actually dead.
>
Well, all those doctors declared these people back from the dead. That
contradicts the original declaration that no one recovers from the
death.
>
All the doctors who didn't have the tools to determine if there was
brain activity declared people dead and they weren't dead eithers.
>
No one recovers from being actually dead.
>
People DO recover from being declared dead.
>
Is that simple enough for you?
>
A doctor declaring someone dead does not mean they are ACTUALLY dead.
>
A long time ago, scientists declared that the sun revolved around the earth.
>
Do you get me yet?
>
>
The article I posted was describing an incident from 2008. Do they qualify
as backward superstitious doctors who can’t determine if people are dead?
>
They never seem "backward" or "superstitious" in recent history, but
they simply didn't have the tools.
>
>
I’m sure you’re way smarter than they were so you can likely answer that
question.
>
I don't have to be smarter to know that as science evolves we learn more
and more.
>
The doctors in the (say) 1950s (or at some earlier time) declared people
dead based on the lack of a pulse. Were they "backward" or
"superstitious" based on the fact that we learned that the heart could
be restarted?
>
>
https://youtu.be/3AZnv1GBLw4?si=cY20vQss7FGSknmP
Sorry, but I don't go search for what you want to say in videos.
Do you understand that doctors (science) currently have incomplete information about what actually constitutes whether or not a person is ACTUALLY dead?
Yes or no.
Answer that, and we can move on to the next question.
Too bad nospam can't see this: Apple adds call recording to iOS 18
Re: Too bad nospam can't see this: Apple adds call recording to iOS 18