Re: Too bad nospam can't see this: Apple adds call recording to iOS 18

Alan wrote:

On 2024-08-13 10:33, badgolferman wrote:

Alan wrote:
>

On 2024-08-13 09:18, badgolferman wrote:

Alan wrote:
>

On 2024-08-13 08:31, badgolferman wrote:

Alan wrote:
>

Now answer my question.

>
Now we have moved on to an interrogation from the bulldog
who can never let go.

>
Now we have moved to the phase where you refuse to have a
discussion, and instead reply with memes.
>
Back on the topic of whether anyone has ever come back from
the dead:
>
Do you understand that doctors (science) currently have
incomplete information about what actually constitutes
whether or not a person is ACTUALLY dead?
>
Yes or no.

>
It's interesting how you frame your question in a sly way so you
will be right however I answer it.  It would be more honest of
you to just state your case rather than attempt to walk me into
your trap.
>

>
My case is that someone who currently is declared dead by the
tests available to us today who "comes back to life" was never
dead in the first place.
>
Just like people who were declared dead because they had no pulse
were never actually dead back when THAT was the metric used to
declare death.

>
>
Those people were declared dead by the science (doctors) of the
time.

>
But we now KNOW they weren't... ...right?
>
Those doctors were wrong, because they didn't understand things as
well as we do now... ...right?
>

Using the standards of today to judge people from the past is
unfair.

>
I'm not judging PEOPLE. Well... ...except you.

Nope.  They were pronounced dead then and are most likely dead now.

Who are you to question the smartest men of the time?  You're not even
the smartest man in this room!

--
"I have tried to know absolutely nothing about a great many things, and
I have succeeded fairly well." ~Robert Benchley