Re: "Performance king"

Liste des GroupesRevenir à mpm iphone 
Sujet : Re: "Performance king"
De : REMOVETHISbadgolferman (at) *nospam* gmail.com (badgolferman)
Groupes : comp.sys.mac.advocacy misc.phone.mobile.iphone
Date : 04. Nov 2024, 21:20:19
Autres entêtes
Organisation : A noiseless patient Spider
Message-ID : <xn0osx0203b27v8001@reader443.eternal-september.org>
References : 1
User-Agent : XanaNews/1.19.1.372 (x86; Portable ISpell)
Alan wrote:

'Apple's M4 Max is the single-core performance king in Geekbench 6 —
M4 Max beats the Core Ultra 9 285K and Ryzen 9 9950X
>
All that power is in a small package.'
>
<https://www.tomshardware.com/pc-components/cpus/apples-m4-max-is-the-single-core-performance-king-in-geekbench-6-m4-max-beats-the-core-ultra-9-285k-and-ryzen-9-9950x>
>
'On the x86 end, AMD and Intel pale in contrast. The M4 Max handily
keeps up even in multi-core at a fraction of the power—beating
Intel's Core Ultra 9 285K by around 19% in the single-core category
and 16% in the multi-core category. Compared to the Ryzen 9 9950X,
the M4 Max showed 18% higher single-core performance and 25% higher
multi-core performance.'
>
But there are those who believe that Apple is terrible at chip design.
>
:-)


Why is this on the iPhone group?  This seems to be a desktop topic.

Date Sujet#  Auteur
4 Nov 24 * "Performance king"10Alan
4 Nov 24 +* Re: "Performance king"7Tom Elam
4 Nov 24 i`* Re: "Performance king"6Alan
5 Nov 24 i +* Re: "Performance king"3Tom Elam
5 Nov 24 i i+- Re: "Performance king"1Alan
6 Nov 24 i i`- Re: "Performance king"1Your Name
5 Nov 24 i `* Re: "Performance king"2Tom Elam
5 Nov 24 i  `- Re: "Performance king"1Alan
4 Nov 24 `* Re: "Performance king"2badgolferman
4 Nov 24  `- Re: "Performance king"1Alan

Haut de la page

Les messages affichés proviennent d'usenet.

NewsPortal