Re: Q: Why do Apple trolls know nothing about anything?

On 2024-11-09 11:59, Andrews wrote:

badgolferman wrote on Sat, 9 Nov 2024 18:25:11 -0000 (UTC) :
 

  If only they had built
in an access panel for the air filter...

Same with the CCV on my 525i which is merely a PCV but with a far more

complex design such that BMW decided to call it, instead, a CCV.
>
It's horribly complicated.
>
And as a result, it *always* eats itself up in just a few years.
>
So *everyone* with that bimmer model has to replace it.
>
Like your Gold%20Wing/Gold-Wing/Goldwing/etc. air filter joke, it's as if
BMW started with a CCV and then built the entire engine around that one
emissions component.
>
It wouldn't be so bad if it didn't fail emissions - but it often does.
>
So everyone who knows anything about that bimmer model is well acquainted
with the CCV (among other horridly designed engine components).
>
If they claim to be knowledgeable in that model, and if they don't know
about the CCV, then it's clear that they're just posers playing games.
>
Like Alan Baker who never knew what a catenary was until I explained it to
him in terms of sweeping around curves at constant speeds.

Except you don't "sweep around curves at constant speeds" when you're road racing, Arlen.

>
Alan Baker was so stupid, even after he looked it up - he thought it was
about bridges - which proves yet again my point these Apple trolls are
incredibly uneducated, and hence ignorant of everything - especially Apple
products.

Nope. That's simply false.

>
Even when told a catenary had to do with taking curves at speed, these
Apple trolls insisted a catenary has only to do with suspension bridges.

False again.

>
That's how stupid these Apple trolls truly are.
>
They read Wikipedia, which I'm sure mentions suspension bridges, and they
don't have the education to flip the terms 90 degrees to sweeping out
curves at constant speed.

You don't take curves at constant speeds when racing, doofus.