Re: Piece of shit iOS has absolutely zero privacy for God's sake

badgolferman wrote on Fri, 22 Nov 2024 18:01:08 -0000 (UTC) :
>

We only have to get rid of the remaining "shit-show trolls" (as
you refer to them) of Jolly Roger, Alan Baker, Alan Browne, Chris,
Haemactylus, Joerg Lorenz, et al., and this newsgroup would start
to become normal again

 
I'd have to excuse Chris from that list.  He seems far more
reasonable  than the rest of the hive.

>
I agree with you that Chris is "far more reasonable" than the rest of
the hive as I've studied all of their strange actions, such that I'd
put them into these loose groupings of similar personalities when
posting here.
>
>
Jolly Roger === Lewis
Alan Baker === Joerg Lorenz
Haemactylus === Your Name
Alan Browne === Chris
nospam === he is in a category of his own
>
The reason nospam is in his own category is that he actually knew far
more about Apple devices than the rest of the Apple trolls did, even
as if we took him at face value - we would conclude he knew nothing -
but he was simply denying everything that Apple didn't do as not
needed & not wanted.
>
Alan Browne and Chris are together in a category as they can actually
think for themselves (e.g., Alan Browne loves to quote Apple white
papers, and Alan Browne came up with his own analogy that the
walled-garden restrictions are an elite "clubhouse" that you have to
pay dearly to be admitted to). Likewise, Chris can discuss some
things on an adult level.
>
Haemactylus & Your Name can't discuss anything at an adult level, and
neither can Alan Baker & Joerg Lorenz but the category differences
are that the latter two post frequently to this ng while the former
two do not, and, what Haemactylus & Your Name post is drivel never
related to the topic.
>
Not that Alan Baker & Joerg Lorenz don't post drivel - the difference
being Alan & Joerg have no purpose for posting other than for their
own amusement.
>
When it comes to the king of Apple trolls though (now that nospam's
contract ran out) is Jolly Roger, who has been posting to this
newsgroup for at least as long as I have and who is the classic
epitome of the Apple troll.
>
To Jolly Roger, anything that is NOT a cheering squad for the Apple
troll team, is something to be reviled. Detested to the level that
Jolly Roger hurls vicious yet childish "your mother is a slut" type
of inane childish vindictives (as he's a fifth-grade sadistic bully
in all ways possible).
>
As for nospam... he was perhaps the most despicable of these Apple
trolls, in that he brazenly lied to everyone to their face without
any qualms.
>
Where we can lump both Jolly Roger & nospam is they are both sadistic
completely unprepossessing human beings whose very existence proves
that such evil people who possess no human value can be so horrible
to those that do simply because they have been told their entire
lives that they're stupid - and they want to get back at everyone
else for doing that to them.
>
Do you think I have them better pegged appropriately enough yet with
those clarifying distinctions above?