Re: Joel won't, so I will (was Re: Bungling Apple Lost the Plot on Texting

Your Name <YourName@YourISP.com> wrote:

On 2024-11-27 00:15:06 +0000, Joel said:

Alan <nuh-uh@nope.com> wrote:

 And it had how much storage, again?  Heh.

 You imagine that as some great "gotcha", do you?

 Yeah, it is, because it's where Apple rips people off.  Why is 256 GB
still the basic option?  In almost 2025?  Retarded.

 Because you obviously don't understand Apple's CPUs and / or stuck in
the same old MHz-myth style nonsense that caused Apple to swap to Intel
CPU years ago. Apple's chips simply don't actually need as much RAM as
Intel CISC CPUs do.

  The 256 GB is storage, not RAM, and why would RISC need *less* RAM?
You're talking out of your ass, apparently.