Re: Joel won't, so I will (was Re: Bungling Apple Lost the Plot on Texting

Alan <nuh-uh@nope.com> wrote:

since a Mac system is unlikely to dual-boot, compared to
a PC, the hardware from Apple isn't totally terrible.  My machine
isn't really different, it just divides the SoC into different parts.
It's just that if I had some need for Windows, I would be able to
install it comfortably, or if I wanted to have a second modern drive
for some other reason.

>
Why are you focused on dual booting as the only reason to have more than
one drive?

I wrote above that it might be other reasons, but it's a reason that
matters when you don't want to share one drive between OSes.

--
Joel W. Crump

Amendment XIV
Section 1.

[...] No state shall make or enforce any law which shall
abridge the privileges or immunities of citizens of the
United States; nor shall any state deprive any person of
life, liberty, or property, without due process of law;
nor deny to any person within its jurisdiction the equal
protection of the laws.

Dobbs rewrites this, it is invalid precedent.  States are
liable for denying needed abortions, e.g. TX.