Re: Racist Apple is targeting blacks only and abusing white women to do it.

Alan <nuh-uh@nope.com> wrote:

Apple uses a kernel called XNU that they developed from Mach and
other sources with huge amounts of their own work as well.
>
Now, here's a question for you:
>
Why is it even important which kernel Apple uses?

>
They didn't build it from scratch, like Winblows NT did.  Why did
Gates hire Cutler?  Why did Apple wish they could've?

>
Why SHOULD they build it from scratch.

>
*That* is the question, believe it or not.

>
One you're not answering...

 
Why do you think we call GNU/Linux mainly "Linux", it's a tribute to
Torvalds for being beyond a genius.

>
That still doesn't answer the question.

I can boot my modern PC with Linux, because a person with the mind to
create a kernel exists.  Apple never acquired a programmer quite on
that level, clearly.

And Microsoft hired Cutler, because THEY didn't want to start from
scratch...
>
...because Cutler had been one of the technical product leads on VMS...
>
...which Windows NT internally very much resembles.
>
<https://everything2.com/title/The+similarities+between+VMS+and+Windows+NT>

>
Uh huh.  But Cutler did start from scratch, emulating what he did
before, emulating what anyone would do, it's like the discovery of
ketamine, they didn't really invent or design it, they *found* it.

"emulating what he did before" is NOT starting from scratch.

 
The code for NT is original Microsoft.  That is simply not the case
with macOS and Apple, on some level.

A lot of it is pretty much copied from VMS.
>
And again... ...so what?
>
There is a very small amount of code in macOS that comes from Mach and
BSD...
>
...and vastly, VASTLY more than is completely original.

Fair enough.

--
Joel W. Crump

Amendment XIV
Section 1.

[...] No state shall make or enforce any law which shall
abridge the privileges or immunities of citizens of the
United States; nor shall any state deprive any person of
life, liberty, or property, without due process of law;
nor deny to any person within its jurisdiction the equal
protection of the laws.

Dobbs rewrites this, it is invalid precedent.  States are
liable for denying needed abortions, e.g. TX.