Re: Racist Apple is targeting blacks only and abusing white women to do it.

On 2024-12-11 16:13, Joel wrote:

Alan <nuh-uh@nope.com> wrote:
 

It's about the degree of feature implementation, Apple is lightweight.
Without M$ Office and Adobe, and movie editing, Apple would be
nothing.

Without application software ANY personal computer is nothing.

>
Microsoft produces the OS and applications, and games.  The open-
source world does much the same for itself.

>
The "open source world" is not remotely the same thing as a private
company.
>
And if the only apps available for Windows were the apps that Microsoft
offers and Apple had all the apps it currently has...
>
...Windows would instantly flop.

  But M$ *does* have the diversity of production that Apple is a little
light on.

And it's irrelevant to the quality of Apple's hardware or operating systems.

 

And the fact that Microsoft also happens to be an application writer is
neither here nor there to the issue of the quality of the Mac and its
operating system.

>
Macs are good at being Macs.  Linux is superior software, though, and
so is M$.

>
In what way is any Linux software superior.

  You are astoundingly blind not to see it, you think free == not as
good.  It's not really the truth.  Commercial-OS apps have rarely
mattered to the extent Microsoft would love for you to believe.

So you cannot articulate a single thing.
Got it.

 

And BTW: hands down, one of the very best movie editing packages in the
world is Final Cut Pro...
>
...produced by Apple.
>
<https://fcp.cafe/cut-on-fcp/>
>
As one of the finest music production packages is Logic Pro...
>
...produced by Apple.

>
No argument.  But what about an Internet person like me, where the
choice of OS really makes no difference?  It's obvious why I'd
therefore like Linux.

>
No. Because every time you've been challenged to explain, you run away.

  I could use macOS, Winblows or Linux, and it would make little
difference in my tasks.  But it's certainly most straightforward to
attack that with Linux and its software, along with this Windows app
Forte Agent for Usenet.

You think "Forte Agent" is something special do you?
What do you do with it that I cannot do with Thunderbird?

 

Answer his question:
>
How is the Finder's GUI materially different (and implicitly lacking)?

>
It's not feature-rich like M$.

So you're comparing a file manager to a company now?
>
In what way is the Finder not "feature-rich" when compared to "File
Explorer".
>
Give a specific example.

  You ever hear of the second mouse button?

Yup. But it isn't a feature of the file manager, and the Mac has supported a second mouse button since 1997.
Try again, but get it right for a change.