Re: Racist Apple is targeting blacks only and abusing white women to do it.

Alan <nuh-uh@nope.com> wrote:

You still can't find a single specific way in which Linux software is
superior.
>
Got it.

 
It's the overall experience.  Linux easily passes the bar.

>
Another non-answer...

Play an MP3 on Audacious and it's just as good as Winamp.  Write a
letter with LibreOffice, although admittedly it's just as great on
Winblows too.  You give up nothing of real value by using Linux.

You think "Forte Agent" is something special do you?
>
What do you do with it that I cannot do with Thunderbird?

>
It's the most comprehensive GUI interface I've seen for Usenet.

>
And you can't run it on Linux...

 
You can, with Wine.

>
Then you're admitting that Linux needs the help of Windows software to
be "superior".

Not very much of it.

[Microsoft Windows] File Explorer has features embedded in right-clicks.

So does the [Apple Mac] Finder.

 
"The" Finder.  You talk about it like it's not just some second-rate
crapp by Apple.  Really hilarious.

>
That's just how it has always been referred to.

Yeah, they tricked you into mimicking the phrasing.

But I guess it was a great way to avoid admitting you were wrong.
>
:-)

I never saw Finder to have the robust features of M$'s file browser.

Contextual menus were introduce to Mac OS in version 8...
>
...in 1997.
>
At just the same time as they added support for a second mouse button.
>
Imagine that!
>
Try again, but maybe check your work before you speak.

 
My memory of such with Snow Leopard was that it was very basic.

So your entire claim that macOS is "inferior" and "simple" is more than
15 years out of date.
>
Got it.

I had the MacBook in 2010.  It was an experiment.  I ended up not
liking macOS.

--
Joel W. Crump

Amendment XIV
Section 1.

[...] No state shall make or enforce any law which shall
abridge the privileges or immunities of citizens of the
United States; nor shall any state deprive any person of
life, liberty, or property, without due process of law;
nor deny to any person within its jurisdiction the equal
protection of the laws.

Dobbs rewrites this, it is invalid precedent.  States are
liable for denying needed abortions, e.g. TX.