Liste des Groupes | Revenir à mpm iphone |
Alan <nuh-uh@nope.com> wrote:And how are those comparisons with macOS; the subject under discussion?
Play an MP3 on Audacious and it's just as good as Winamp. Write a>You still can't find a single specific way in which Linux software is>
superior.
>
Got it.
It's the overall experience. Linux easily passes the bar.
Another non-answer...
letter with LibreOffice, although admittedly it's just as great on
Winblows too. You give up nothing of real value by using Linux.
Still, it's an admission that Linux can't cut it without Windows.Not very much of it.>>>You think "Forte Agent" is something special do you?>
>
What do you do with it that I cannot do with Thunderbird?
It's the most comprehensive GUI interface I've seen for Usenet.
And you can't run it on Linux...
You can, with Wine.
Then you're admitting that Linux needs the help of Windows software to
be "superior".
Who cares?Yeah, they tricked you into mimicking the phrasing.>>[Microsoft Windows] File Explorer has features embedded in right-clicks.So does the [Apple Mac] Finder.
"The" Finder. You talk about it like it's not just some second-rate
crapp by Apple. Really hilarious.
That's just how it has always been referred to.
Name ONE feature you used that you didn't see in the Finder?But I guess it was a great way to avoid admitting you were wrong.I never saw Finder to have the robust features of M$'s file browser.
>
:-)
Nevertheless, you pontificate 14 years later as if you know all about how macOS works today.I had the MacBook in 2010. It was an experiment. I ended up notSo your entire claim that macOS is "inferior" and "simple" is more thanContextual menus were introduce to Mac OS in version 8...>
>
...in 1997.
>
At just the same time as they added support for a second mouse button.
>
Imagine that!
>
Try again, but maybe check your work before you speak.
My memory of such with Snow Leopard was that it was very basic.
15 years out of date.
>
Got it.
liking macOS.
Les messages affichés proviennent d'usenet.