Sujet : Re: Racist Apple is targeting blacks only and abusing white women to do it.
De : joelcrump (at) *nospam* gmail.com (Joel)
Groupes : misc.phone.mobile.iphone comp.os.linux.advocacyDate : 12. Dec 2024, 20:22:40
Autres entêtes
Organisation : A noiseless patient Spider
Message-ID : <47dmljprdi5itvkl8hf67hl90m3kadjgh3@4ax.com>
References : 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12
User-Agent : ForteAgent/8.00.32.1272
Alan <
nuh-uh@nope.com> wrote:
Linux's native apps for this are better than Apple-centric macOS GUI
apps [and therefore don't need replacement with Windows apps].
>
Ignoring that you are now attempting to deflect, you declared macOS to
be inadequate simply because it COULD run Windows apps in CrossOver...
???
...so why isn't Linux inadequate when you actually CHOOSE to run Windows
apps?
How are you drawing a distinction there?
>
I'm not.
>
YOU are.
>
YOU are calling macOS inadequate for being able to do something that not
only can one do in Linux, but moreover something YOU actually need to do.
I'm using Agent because I always used it. It's one app. I actually
would be motivated to switch if I were using macOS, probably, to
Usenapp, but that would be crazy given that Linux is the OS I would
prefer to run..
And turning to your deflections:
>
Name such an app.
For Usenet, I've heard good things about Usenapp for macOS, never seen
it, it didn't exist when I had mine. It may be better than what's
available for Linux GUI. But certainly Linux has options for GUI IRC.
You're supposed to be supporting your claim that:
>
'Linux's native apps for this are better than Apple-centric macOS GUI apps'
>
And with no surprise at all, you're completely failing.
If I were starting without any Windows apps, I'd want to go toward
Linux for choice, yes. There are specific things macOS excels at, but
I'm an Internet person, simply having a quality desktop is the
experience. It's hardly surprising I'd be running Linux.
-- Joel W. CrumpAmendment XIVSection 1.[...] No state shall make or enforce any law which shall
abridge the privileges or immunities of citizens of the
United States; nor shall any state deprive any person of
life, liberty, or property, without due process of law;
nor deny to any person within its jurisdiction the equal
protection of the laws.
Dobbs rewrites this, it is invalid precedent. States are
liable for denying needed abortions, e.g. TX.