Re: Racist Apple is targeting blacks only and abusing white women to do it.

Alan <nuh-uh@nope.com> wrote:

Linux's native apps for this are better than Apple-centric macOS GUI
apps [and therefore don't need replacement with Windows apps].
>

Ignoring that you are now attempting to deflect, you declared macOS to
be inadequate simply because it COULD run Windows apps in CrossOver...

>
???
>

...so why isn't Linux inadequate when you actually CHOOSE to run Windows
apps?

>
How are you drawing a distinction there?

>
I'm not.
>
YOU are.
>
YOU are calling macOS inadequate for being able to do something that not
only can one do in Linux, but moreover something YOU actually need to do.

>
I'm using Agent because I always used it.  It's one app.  I actually
would be motivated to switch if I were using macOS, probably, to
Usenapp, but that would be crazy given that Linux is the OS I would
prefer to run..

>
Actually, it was TWO apps when last I checked...

 
I have three Windows apps installed, but Agent is the big one in use.

>
Proving my your own metric that Linux is inadequate.

Incorrect, Intel Macs can do this too with CrossOver or even just
installing Wine.  Agent is very workable with Wine.

But you're continuing to ignore the point.
>
You're claiming that the mere EXISTENCE of a facility to run Windows
software under macOS (CrossOver Mac) proves the inadequacy of macOS...
>
...so why doesn't the existence of the same facility on Linux prove its
inadequacy?

 
 
Neither are bad things, actually.  I'm claiming that for IRC, Linux
has better options, and has options for Usenet that are acceptable,
including running a Windows client.

>
And yet you declared it was proof of macOS's inadequacy...
>
...while not saying the same about Linux.

Well, it's easier to use Wine than a VM of Win11 ARM.

And turning to your deflections:
>
Name such an app.

>
For Usenet, I've heard good things about Usenapp for macOS, never seen
it, it didn't exist when I had mine.  It may be better than what's
available for Linux GUI.  But certainly Linux has options for GUI IRC.

You're supposed to be supporting your claim that:
>
'Linux's native apps for this are better than Apple-centric macOS GUI apps'
>
And with no surprise at all, you're completely failing.

>
>
If I were starting without any Windows apps, I'd want to go toward
Linux for choice, yes.  There are specific things macOS excels at, but
I'm an Internet person, simply having a quality desktop is the
experience.  It's hardly surprising I'd be running Linux.

>
You made a specific claim:
>
'Linux's native apps for this are better than Apple-centric macOS GUI apps'
>
In what way are they "better"?

 
Usenapp really may be a great GUI app for Usenet, like Agent,
available on macOS.  But I would still use Linux because of other
software.  Hell, on a Mac, I'd probably even get M$ Office.  But
that's kind of the point.  Now I've spent all this money on a computer
and software, that doesn't do anything better than I can with Linux
and LibreOffice.

This wasn't about what you LIKE, doofus.
>
This was about your declaration that:
>
'Linux's native apps for this are better than Apple-centric macOS GUI apps'
>
Now, I don't know whether you were just referring to WiNE vs CrossOver
Mac, or apps in general, but for once in your miserable existence, try
backing up a claim you've made.

I actually might retract, in part, that Linux is better for a GUI IRC
client than macOS.  It's probably still technically true, but not in
the precise way I meant.  So, actually, macOS is pretty good for
Usenet and IRC support.

--
Joel W. Crump

Amendment XIV
Section 1.

[...] No state shall make or enforce any law which shall
abridge the privileges or immunities of citizens of the
United States; nor shall any state deprive any person of
life, liberty, or property, without due process of law;
nor deny to any person within its jurisdiction the equal
protection of the laws.

Dobbs rewrites this, it is invalid precedent.  States are
liable for denying needed abortions, e.g. TX.