Sujet : Re: RCS is not more private and secure than texting according to the FBI
De : nuh-uh (at) *nospam* nope.com (Alan)
Groupes : comp.mobile.android misc.phone.mobile.iphoneDate : 18. Dec 2024, 09:15:57
Autres entêtes
Organisation : A noiseless patient Spider
Message-ID : <vju0bu$27aaa$1@dont-email.me>
References : 1 2 3 4 5 6
User-Agent : Mozilla Thunderbird
On 2024-12-17 23:22, Jörg Lorenz wrote:
On 18.12.24 01:15, Carlos E.R. wrote:
On 2024-12-18 00:36, Arno Welzel wrote:
Jörg Lorenz, 2024-12-17 16:58:
>
On 17.12.24 15:08, Carlos E.R. wrote:
On 2024-12-17 07:19, Jörg Lorenz wrote:
Avoid to use RCS!
>
If an iPhone is involved. It's fine on Android. The article you posted
says so.
>
You do not understand what happens.
RCS is Google's wet dream. Nobody needs it or wants it.
>
RCS works fine - much better than MMS ever was. Google just added a
proprietary encryption to it.
>
Proprietary, maybe, but they did not block Apple from using it. It was
Apple who decided not even to try using it. Ok, it is not an standard,
but it exists, it is there, ready to use. Just use, then agree into an
standard, and implement it next.
That is naive. Proprietary and encryption are a contradiction.
And you do not seem to understand the powerplay of big tech.
No. Proprietary and encryption are NOT a contradiction.
Don't argue from false positions.
RCS is not more private and secure than texting according to the FBI
Re: RCS is not more private and secure than texting according to the FBI
