Sujet : Re: Bungling Apple Lost the Plot on Texting
De : recscuba_google (at) *nospam* huntzinger.com (-hh)
Groupes : comp.mobile.android comp.os.linux.advocacy misc.phone.mobile.iphone sac.politics talk.politics.gunsSuivi-à : comp.os.linux.advocacyDate : 21. Dec 2024, 15:35:30
Autres entêtes
Organisation : A noiseless patient Spider
Message-ID : <vk6jni$2ids$1@dont-email.me>
References : 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16
User-Agent : Mozilla Thunderbird
On 12/21/24 12:37 AM, ND beat Indy wrote:
On 12/20/2024 7:05 PM, -hh wrote:
On 12/20/24 8:42 PM, Alan wrote:
On 2024-12-20 17:19, Joel wrote:
Alan <nuh-uh@nope.com> wrote:
On 2024-12-20 16:50, will wrote:
>
Why limit yourself to one OS? Run both.
>
Or as you could do on a Mac: run all three!
>
>
The Mac running Winblows is not that credible, possible to boot it
sure, but it's a small side thing.
>
It is absolutely credible...
>
...or at least it was absolutely credible...
>
...until Apple started producing better processors and using them.
>
:-)
>
Its just no longer Boot Camp today, but easily done by running within a VM; ARM64 Windows 11 is presently at version 24H2: same as x86 Win11.
Compatibility on 11 is poor. Some things run okay, other things like enterprise storage management software has fractured windows that operate but can't display anything. The software works fine on 10,8,7. It has another three years before it's EOS/EOL so equipment owners must maintain Windows 10 VMs to manage their investments unless an OEM provides updates.
Sure, because all software developers have their own priority list, even if customers' workflows are hindered by it.
Fortunately, in a big enterprise setup where there's big corporate storage management, if an employee's duties requires both MacOS and WinOS, the business solution is to simply buy them the hardware of one of each & not worry about one PC trying to do both via a VM. BTDT.
-hh