Sujet : Re: Joel gets a taste of reality
De : nuh-uh (at) *nospam* nope.com (Alan)
Groupes : misc.phone.mobile.iphone comp.os.linux.advocacyDate : 02. Jan 2025, 00:22:20
Autres entêtes
Organisation : A noiseless patient Spider
Message-ID : <vl4inc$300nq$1@dont-email.me>
References : 1 2 3 4 5 6 7
User-Agent : Mozilla Thunderbird
On 2025-01-01 15:10, Joel wrote:
Alan <nuh-uh@nope.com> wrote:
So to exactly what "punch" did Samsung beat Apple?
>
I screwed up, actually, this phone isn't imitating Samsung.
>
Fixed the subject for you.
>
And yet, if I had first examined the article correctly, it would make
Apple showing *progress*, which is kind of funny since your defense is
that *I* was wrong, just some guy online who can wrap my mind around
why Apple does it the way it does. I mean, not in the sense of
agreement, but in the sense of seeing that they are OK with being
weird.
>
"It would MAKE Apple showing progress"?
"It would mean that Apple was showing progress" is what I should have
edited it to say.
In what way would it mean that Apple was showing progress?
Literally, all there is in the article is a rumour that Apple will be changing the NAME they use for a product.
I'm not going to bother with the rest of your gibberish.
>
Dude, try again, but this time in English.
Oh gibberish, huh, unlike Apple's UI, heh. That's a great descriptor
for it, malformed functions, inferior, and yet the Apple name sells
these devices.
What function(s) in Apple's is/(are) "malformed"?
When you've put yourself in a huge hole...
...stop digging.