Re: apple intelligence not so intelligent

On 2025-01-17 00:48:49 +0000, Rick said:

On 1/16/2025 6:55 PM, Your Name wrote:

On 2025-01-16 22:18:10 +0000, Rick said:

On 1/16/2025 4:15 PM, Your Name wrote:

On 2025-01-16 16:02:46 +0000, badgolferman said:
>

Apple has come under intense scrutiny for rolling out an underbaked
AI-powered feature that summarizes breaking news — while often
butchering it beyond recognition.

<snip>
>
So, no different to any other idiotic AI nonsense. They should all be avoided by any sane person because they're all just useless, over-hyped crap that they are. Hopefully it will be just another quickly gone tech fad.
>

>
AI is nothing more than software, which means that, like any other software program, it is only as good as it the way it is programmed.

>
And hence why so-called "Artifical Intelligence" is not actually intelligence of any kind. It's simpl;y a computer program doing what it has been programmed to do. It does NOT "learn" and it does NOT "think", and it can never do either of those things.
>
>
>

I agree that a lot of AI isn't very good (and Apple is clearly on that list), but from the limited testing I have done, I think certain more mature LLM products like ChatGPT and Copilot are actually quite useful when used properly.

>
Not really. ChatGPT has numerous issues as well.

>
That's why I say "when used properly".

 You can use it as "properly" as you like, but the entire idea is massively flawed, so it will never work properly at all. AI is simply useless, over-hyped crap that all the idiot tech companies are jumping on the bandwagon of as the latest fad.