Re: EI mew ;abeling regulations June 20th 2025

On 2025-01-28 14:21, Carlos E.R. wrote:

On 2025-01-28 21:39, Alan wrote:

On 2025-01-28 03:38, Carlos E.R. wrote:

On 2025-01-28 01:41, Alan wrote:

On 2025-01-27 16:39, Carlos E.R. wrote:

On 2025-01-27 22:56, Alan wrote:

On 2025-01-27 13:38, Peter wrote:

Your Name <YourName@YourISP.com> wrote:
>

Huh, no. It would be a standard if many manufacturers followed it. None did.

>
It still has a set of "standards", in the sense of the rules Apple
defined as to what it can and cannot do, how it should be made, etc.

>
What non-Apple device charged by Apple's proprietary Lightning cable?

>
Wrong question?
>
What third party products conformed to Apple's specs for Lightning?
>
The answer is: "Many, many, many".

>
Only those designed to work with Apple hardware, not generic hardware.

>
Yes. That is LITERALLY what I just said.
>

>
Me, I have only once seen one such device, a pair of earphone buds that my bank used as a gift.

The point is that there was not industry-wide standard for smartphone connectivity...
>
...so Apple designed and used something better than any of the available options.

>
Which was not accepted as industry-wide standard.

And so nothing that isn't "industry-wide" can ever be a standard, is that right?

 Doubtful. It is a limited use standard, an attempt at a standard, dunno.
 

Failure to answer the question; probably because you thought for a moment about how many standards there are that aren't actually used "industry-wide", hey?
:-)