Re: [NEWS] iPhone 16e announced

On 2025-02-20 13:35, badgolferman wrote:

Alan <nuh-uh@nope.com> wrote:

On 2025-02-20 13:30, badgolferman wrote:

You still didn’t mention what your objection is.

>
According to you, just quoting a lot of text is "providing a topic"...
>
...right?
>

>

 It was a news article. Informative stuff that helps the reader know more.
Just because you didn’t like the article doesn’t mean it wasn’t helpful to
others. Rather than criticize, why not provide more insightful opinion? And
if you can’t do that then just let it go.

Wow. Let's break this down:
"It was a news article. Informative stuff that helps the reader know more."
Well, duh! It would have been a news article if he'd only presented a link.
"Just because you didn’t like the article doesn’t mean it wasn’t helpful to others."
Where do you get the idea that I "didn't like the article", quisling?
Or did you mean to say "Just because [I] didn't like the POST"?
"And if you can’t do that then just let it go."
I offered a critique in answer to your question:
'I appreciate the full post without comment.'
1. It WASN'T a full post. But by posting a long excerpt, it gave the impression that it might have been the full text.
2. It wasn't a "post" at all. You seem to have a problem with the usafe of the words "post" and "article".
3. You've claimed that it "provided a topic". A simple link to the article on Apple's site would have done that just as much. In order to start an actually conversation, having an opinion on a "news article" is pretty much a necessity.