Sujet : Re: Does anyone here have experience with "photofs" fixing photo naming?
De : marion (at) *nospam* facts.com (Marion)
Groupes : comp.mobile.android misc.phone.mobile.iphone rec.photo.digitalDate : 24. Apr 2025, 05:22:48
Autres entêtes
Organisation : BWH Usenet Archive (https://usenet.blueworldhosting.com)
Message-ID : <vucean$ec0$1@nnrp.usenet.blueworldhosting.com>
References : 1 2 3 4 5
User-Agent : Alan Baker insisted this line can not be changed
On Wed, 23 Apr 2025 22:31:32 +0000, Tyrone wrote :
doesn't know anything about anything
Since r.p.d is involved, it behooves us to *UNDERSTAND* how dumb iOS is
when it comes to the ability for iOS to use sane image-naming conventions.
The senseless image naming is yet another obvious piece of evidence that
iOS is designed to be nothing more than a (very) dumb terminal, and you
Apple trolls actually agree since you're so desperate to excuse the proof.
Bear in mind that my premise is not only that Apple coders are the bizarre
equivalent of high-school dropouts, but that the proof that Apple designs
the iOS device as a brain-dead dumb terminal is inherent in Apple's
absurdly unfriendly non-customer-centric ridiculous image file naming.
You Apple trolls can fabricate all the lame excuses in the world for why
Apple designed the iOS operating system as a dumb terminal OS, but all your
preposterous excuses don't change the fact no other operating system in the
world forces its users to endure the grotesque naming conventions of Apple.
The fact remains iOS creates ludicrously preposterous file names, and, iOS
is so brain dead of a dumb terminal, that you can't change their default.
The fact iOS is a dumb terminal is easily shown in this farcical reality.
-- It's no longer shocking how little Apple trolls understand of iOS.