Sujet : Re: Does anyone here have experience with "photofs" fixing photo naming?
De : marion (at) *nospam* facts.com (Marion)
Groupes : comp.mobile.android misc.phone.mobile.iphone rec.photo.digitalDate : 24. Apr 2025, 05:30:25
Autres entêtes
Organisation : BWH Usenet Archive (https://usenet.blueworldhosting.com)
Message-ID : <vucep0$23sn$1@nnrp.usenet.blueworldhosting.com>
References : 1 2 3 4 5 6 7
User-Agent : Alan Baker insisted this line can not be changed
On Wed, 23 Apr 2025 08:32:23 +0200, Herbert Kleebauer wrote :
Seems they are using "Universally Unique IDentifiers" (UUIDs) (rfc9562)
as file names:
https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/html/rfc9562
Hi Herbert,
You're intelligent, so I can converse with you on a level that is far and
above that which the common Apple trolls can possibly comprehend.
IMHO, most people don't understand iOS is designed, by Apple, to be nothing
more than a dumb terminal - which *requires* logging into Apple's matrix
servers to do the simplest of the most basic of the most common things.
I do understand that. Not only because I'm intelligent.
But because I have plenty of iOS devices.
And therefore, I see what they do with respect to image naming conventions.
And I point out this starkly obvious evidence you, yourself dug up, that
shows iOS is designed as nothing more than a (very) dumb terminal.
Apple's iOS is the only common consumer operating system that is designed
to badly that it can't even use sensible consumer-friendly image names.
While I'm well aware that iOS is nothing more than a (very) dumb terminal,
I, for one, do not wish to endure Apple's grotesque naming conventions.
Which is the reason, after all, for the technical question I posed herein.
-- Only one out of billions understand anything about Apple's core strategy.