Re: Why is overall Apple mobile device battery endurance per cycle 16% less compared to Samsung?

Liste des GroupesRevenir à mpm iphone 
Sujet : Re: Why is overall Apple mobile device battery endurance per cycle 16% less compared to Samsung?
De : marion (at) *nospam* facts.com (Marion)
Groupes : comp.sys.mac.advocacy misc.phone.mobile.iphone comp.mobile.ipad
Date : 07. Jul 2025, 20:05:18
Autres entêtes
Organisation : BWH Usenet Archive (https://usenet.blueworldhosting.com)
Message-ID : <104h5pe$261l$1@nnrp.usenet.blueworldhosting.com>
References : 1 2 3 4
User-Agent : ForteAgent/8.00.32.1272
On Sun, 6 Jul 2025 15:40:56 -0400, -hh wrote :


Don't you wonder why I said "mobile devices" in the Subject & not phones?
 
The USS Nimitz is a "mobile device".

It used to be Apple tells the truth only in court.
But even that is no longer the case.
 *Apple lied, yet again, this time, criminally under oath!*
 <https://www.cnbc.com/2025/04/30/court-finds-apple-executive-lied-under-oath.html>

Knowing that Apple never tells the truth, even in court and knowing Apple
spins the most clever of lies, um, er, I mean excuses (e.g., you're holding
it wrong, or Apple battery physics is tied to the iOS version, or it's
"courageous" to remove functionality that works just fine, or it's green to
make you go buy the correct charger for your phone, etc.)...

It's revealing that Apple lied that they "downgraded" their efficiency.

Nobody else had to make inanely absurd excuses.
Just Apple.

Nobody else couldn't earn an A in efficiency either.
Only Apple.

And, nobody else (to my knowledge) has been touting efficiency for years.
A claimed efficiency that is known that no 3rd party has ever reproduced.

Hmmm... interesting, isn't it.

What metric did Apple downgrade?
Apple didn't say.

Hmmm... So Apple was part of the process, and Apple used the same testing
companies everyone else used, and Apple knew about the standards years in
advance, and, only now, when they fail to earn an A, all of a sudden, Apple
casts undeclared aspersions on the entire testing process?

Who does that?

It's deceitful.
It's Apple.

Now, we as rather well educated and logical adults are all seeking to find
out EXACTLY what Apple "voluntarily downgrade" since Apple didn't say what.

Hmmm... they truncated the battery endurance.
But that makes no difference whatsoever in the numbers.

If you truncate Samsung's results, it comes out the same essentially.
Same with Google.

Clever Apple.
Very clever.

They "voluntarily downgrade" a metric that doesn't even matter.

You'll never hear me say Apple isn't brilliant, but at the same time you'll
likely never hear me say the Apple trolls are smart enough to see through
the subterfuge.

The Apple trolls will eat up that "voluntary downgrade" like sheep led to
slaughter. Why? Because they're MAGA religious zealots, that's why.

They have no idea what Apple downgraded, and yet they will claim Apple
downgraded EVERYTHING just so they can be nice guys.

Only an Apple troll believes that, especially since everyone who knows
anything is well aware Apple only tell the truth in cour... oh wait.

Apple has been referred to for CRIMINAL prosecution for their recent lies.

Date Sujet#  Auteur
4 Jul09:33 * Why is overall Apple mobile device battery endurance per cycle 16% less compared to Samsung?12Marion
4 Jul14:26 `* Re: Why ARE Android phones such power sucking junk? (was: Why is overall Apple mobile device battery endurance per cycle 16% less compared to Samsung?)11Tyrone
4 Jul16:30  +- Re: Why ARE Android phones such power sucking junk?1Alan
4 Jul18:43  `* Re: Why is overall Apple mobile device battery endurance per cycle 16% less compared to Samsung?9Marion
5 Jul19:23   +* Re: Why is overall Apple mobile device battery endurance per cycle 16% less compared to Samsung?5Tyrone
5 Jul20:13   i+* Re: Why is overall Apple mobile device battery endurance per cycle 16% less compared to Samsung?3Alan
5 Jul23:08   ii`* Re: Why is overall Apple mobile device battery endurance per cycle 16% less compared to Samsung?2Marion
7 Jul19:50   ii `- Re: Why is overall Apple mobile device battery endurance per cycle 16% less compared to Samsung?1Alan
5 Jul22:56   i`- Re: Why is overall Apple mobile device battery endurance per cycle 16% less compared to Samsung?1Marion
6 Jul20:40   `* Re: Why is overall Apple mobile device battery endurance per cycle 16% less compared to Samsung?3-hh
7 Jul20:05    `* Re: Why is overall Apple mobile device battery endurance per cycle 16% less compared to Samsung?2Marion
7 Jul20:42     `- Re: Why is overall Apple mobile device battery endurance per cycle 16% less compared to Samsung?1Alan

Haut de la page

Les messages affichés proviennent d'usenet.

NewsPortal