Sujet : Re: What's the actual *advantage* of not having an sd slot?
De : address (at) *nospam* is.invalid (R.Wieser)
Groupes : misc.phone.mobile.iphone comp.mobile.androidDate : 08. Jul 2025, 09:13:23
Autres entêtes
Organisation : A noiseless patient Spider
Message-ID : <104ik0j$3ethm$1@dont-email.me>
References : 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12
User-Agent : Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2900.5512
Arlen,
This is a fact:
All other things being equal, a phone without the sd card
slot simply can not do what the phone with an sd card in
that sd card slot can do.
Like what and why would it be of any consequence ?
And mind you, if you come up with examples where your hinging point is "with
an sd-card" and I can replace "sd-card" with "internal storage",
"thumbdrive" and/or "data-cable" than I will discard the example. Just so
you know.
Progressing toward adulthood, they can distinguish facts
from opinions.
>
None of you trolls, have progressed toward that adult milestone,
Chris.
Very early on in this thread you showed us that you are not able either.
And than there is the problem that you keep thinking that everybody else
talking to you is wrong, and only you are right. In that case there is a
"rather big chance" (understatement) that its the other way around.
It's not about whether you use the capability that exists.
It's about whether that capability exists.
Its not, and from your POV has never been.
The absense of why you think its all about that capability existing is also
rather telling.
Besides, I have invited you to a discussion on its technical merrits, and
you refused. Here you're just tring to get that merry-go-round to make
another loop. Who knows, maybe the results will be different this time ?
The fact I have to explain fundamental logic to you
trolls, is sad.
You know what sad ? The fact that you refuse to engage with any argument
that doesn't match your preconceptions.
That none of us here agree with you, but you still think you are the one
who's right.
That you throw matter-of-fact claims around but are refusing to support even
them.
That you think you out-smart us all, but think that, when you can't handle
the message, you should resort to attacking the messenger.
Whats even more sad is that, nonwithstanding you think out-smart us all,
your accusations to the messenger are applicable to yourself.
Given your lack of education, I do not expect you to comprehend logic.
Ah yes, one other example of how you yourself are not able to seperate your
opinion (about someone else) from facts.
To you, *your* opinions *are* facts, while *our* opinions have zero value.
To us ? We know that our opinions are (/ knowledge is) ours, and are happy
to discuss them between each other, taking in new knowledge and root out
misconceptions. IOW, we can learn from our mistakes. A capacity you seem
to sorely lack.
But now I understand why you claim my facts (aka opinions) are "wrong".
No, you don't understand. You never have and you never will.
The *only* thing you "understand" is that we do not agree with you, and thus
we must be wrong.
Regards,
Rudy Wieser