Re: TEST June 2025

Marco Moock in misc.test:

On 04.06.2025 00:00 yeti yeti wrote:

That from line format just looks strange.
 
| From: rjac@shell02.TheWorld.com (Christians against SPAMMING,
sub-human devil worshiper, Andrew 'Andrzej' Baron)

>
A really long name, but that doesn't affect the technical address at
all.

<https://www.rfc-editor.org/rfc/rfc5536.html#section-3.1.2>

Aus <https://www.rfc-editor.org/rfc/rfc5322#section-3.4>:

| Normally, a mailbox is composed of two parts: (1) an optional display
|    name that indicates the name of the recipient (which can be a person
|    or a system) that could be displayed to the user of a mail
|    application, and (2) an addr-spec address enclosed in angle brackets
|    ("<" and ">").  There is an alternate simple form of a mailbox where
|    the addr-spec address appears alone, without the recipient's name or
|    the angle brackets.  The Internet addr-spec address is described in
|    section 3.4.1.
|
|       Note: Some legacy implementations used the simple form where the
|       addr-spec appears without the angle brackets, but included the
|       name of the recipient in parentheses as a comment following the
|       addr-spec.  Since the meaning of the information in a comment is
|       unspecified, implementations SHOULD use the full name-addr form of
|       the mailbox, instead of the legacy form, to specify the display
|       name associated with a mailbox.  Also, because some legacy
|       implementations interpret the comment, comments generally SHOULD
|       NOT be used in address fields to avoid confusing such
|       implementations.

Marcel
--
Fri Jun  6 22:23:39 2025 CEST (1749241419)
pc-731
87 jz5o 62q5
Lines: 42