Re: Request of new hierarchy: usenet.*

Roberto CORRADO <i@secure.corradoroberto.it> wrote:

"Ray Banana" wrote:

,----[ Quote slrnvu7b2l.1888g.rayban@raybanana.net ]
| A Usenet top level hierarchy named "usenet" seems to be a tautology.
| It would also be out of scope for the Big8 management board.
`----

Hi Ray Banana, maybe we "have" gone too far egocentrism...
Thank you all for participating in this discussion, maybe I should have
thought about it earlier that this hierarchy was out of my reach.
But if you would like to add the group only, me and my "friends"
would be happy with that.

I'm sure there's already a comp.* or alt.* group in which AI might be
discussed. AI may be discussed in a miscellaneous group or general group
on a broader computer topic. Use an existing newsgroup that's already
widely created, even if there's negligible on topic discussion in it.
Then your friends will have a place to talk.

There's going to be extreme resistance among many News administrators to
your declared usenet.* top-level hierarchy and your control messages
will not be acted upon at most sites. Please rethink this.