Re: Proposal for the New Top-Level Hierarchy ai.* - Artificial Intelligence

On 1 Apr 2025 17:41:04 GMT, Bingo3331 <invalid@invalid.com> wrote:

On 01/04/25 18:19, D wrote:

"a.i." is certainly an intriguing theme with profound implications extending
far beyond computers, seems worthy of its own newsgroups, "sci.ai", "soc.ai"
but adding new groups or hierarchies to this quasi-dormant usenet necropolis
sounds more like an exercise in futility ... plain text usenet is old-school
which for those inclined to reading, writing, and arithmetic find preferable
to jetsetter, multimedia, always in a hurry to get somewhere fast lifestyles

>
We're not asking for blind faith. Support `ai.*`, propagate the initial
`ai.ita.*` groups, and let's see the results. Corrado Roberto (with his
server at gatto.corradoroberto.it) is ready to handle technical setup and
peering, ensuring minimal burden on other admins. If the groups stay empty,
we'll reassess but if they take off, Usenet gains a vibrant new hub. It's a
low-risk, high-reward chance to breathe life into the network.
What do you think? Could we tweak anything names, charters, or approach--to
address your concerns? We'd love your input to make this a win for
everyone.
Looking forward to your thoughts!

putting these two words together, "artificial" with "intelligence",
is counterintuitive to common sense . . . that's what's wrong with
it because if man could imitate whole planets, mercury for example,
it would surely become a "death star", a superweapon of the empire
humans weaponize everything they touch planet earth is militarized